Tampilkan postingan dengan label H. Samy Alim. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label H. Samy Alim. Tampilkan semua postingan

Senin, 15 Oktober 2012

Left of Black S3:E5 | Style Shifting with POTUS & Occupying the Music



Left of Black S3:E5 |   October 15, 2012

Style Shifting with POTUS & Occupying the Music
Left of Black host and Duke Professor Mark Anthony Neal is joined via Skype by Stanford University Professor H. Samy Alim, co-author of, with legendary social linguist Geneva Smitherman, Articulate While Black: Barack Obama, Language and Race in the U.S. (Oxford University Press).  Later Neal is joined, also via Skype, by singer-songwriter Alison Crockett, whose latest recording Mommy, What’s a Depression? and blog Diva Against Insanity hark back to the socially transformative music of the 1960s.

***

Left of Black is a weekly Webcast hosted by Mark Anthony Neal and produced in collaboration with the John Hope Franklin Center at Duke University.

***

Episodes of Left of Black are also available for free download in  @ iTunes U

Senin, 02 Juli 2012

New Book! Articulate While Black: Barack Obama, Language, and Race in the U.S.



Articulate While Black:
Barack Obama, Language, and Race in the U.S.
by H. Samy Alim and Geneva Smitherman

Foreword by Michael Eric Dyson

Oxford University Press, September 2012


Description:

Barack Obama is widely considered one of the most powerful and charismatic speakers of our age. Without missing a beat, he often moves between Washington insider talk and culturally Black ways of speaking--as shown in a famous YouTube clip, where Obama declined the change offered to him by a Black cashier in a Washington, D.C. restaurant with the phrase, "Nah, we straight."

In Articulate While Black, two renowned scholars of Black Language address language and racial politics in the U.S. through an insightful examination of President Barack Obama's language use--and America's response to it. In this eloquently written and powerfully argued book, H. Samy Alim and Geneva Smitherman provide new insights about President Obama and the relationship between language and race in contemporary society. Throughout, they analyze several racially loaded, cultural-linguistic controversies involving the President--from his use of Black Language and his "articulateness" to his "Race Speech," the so-called "fist-bump," and his relationship to Hip Hop Culture.

Using their analysis of Barack Obama as a point of departure, Alim and Smitherman reveal how major debates about language, race, and educational inequality erupt into moments of racial crisis in America. In challenging American ideas about language, race, education, and power, they help take the national dialogue on race to the next level. In much the same way that Cornel West revealed nearly two decades ago that "race matters," Alim and Smitherman in this groundbreaking book show how deeply "language matters" to the national conversation on race--and in our daily lives.


Table of Contents:

1 "Nah, We Straight": Black Language and America's First Black President

2 A.W.B. (Articulate While Black): Language and Racial Politics in the U.S.

3 Makin A Way Outta No Way: The Race Speech and Obama's Rhetorical Remix

4 "The Fist Bump Heard 'round the World": How Black Communication Becomes Controversial

5 "My President's Black, My Lambo's Blue": Hip Hop, Race, and the Culture Wars

6 Change the Game: Language, Education, and the Cruel Fallout of Racism


Reviews:

"Articulate While Black brilliantly dissects the politics of language as embedded in the politics of race...The beautiful thing about [the book] is that it breaks down Obama's oral signifying...and helps us to navigate the complexities of Black linguistic habits and the complications of Black rhetoric writ large... Alim and Smitherman do a great deal of switching themselves, sliding from dense academic prose to streetwise vernacular, proving they are brilliant examples of the very practice they dissect...In the process, [they] leave little doubt about the cogency of their argument: that without being a past master of Black (American) rhetoric, Obama wouldn't be president of the United States."
--Michael Eric Dyson, University Distinguished Professor of Sociology, and author of Debating Race

"A fabulously original work! Two of America's leading authorities on Black Language and Culture draw on their expertise and extensive scholarship to profoundly reshape the national conversation on race--by "languaging" it. In complicating compliments about President Obama's "articulateness," they brilliantly analyze his artful use of language--and America's response to it--as a springboard to consider larger, thought-provoking questions about language, education, power and what Toni Morrison has referred to as "the cruel fallout of racism." Few sociolinguists tackle these complex issues with as much insight, sophistication, and downright directness as Alim and Smitherman. As they firmly conclude, it's time to change the game - and this book does just that."
--John R. Rickford, J.E. Wallace Sterling Professor of Linguistics and the Humanities at Stanford University, and co-author of Spoken Soul: The Story of Black English

"A sweeping ethnographic and linguistic tour de force that moves between popular culture and political culture with unprecedented academic verve. Daps to Alim and Dr. G."
--T. Denean Sharpley-Whiting, Gertrude Conaway Vanderbilt Distinguished Professor, Vanderbilt University, and editor of The Speech: Race and Barack Obama's "A More Perfect Union"

"The game done changed, and it looks like the iconic figure of Barack Hussein Obama read through the formidable critical lens of leading sociolinguists H. Samy Alim and Geneva Smitherman. Trafficking in the very linguistic style-shifting that the duo charge President Obama with, Articulate While Black is a groundbreaking and definitive exploration of the cultural meaning of the nation's first Black President."
--Mark Anthony Neal, Duke University, author of New Black Man


About the Author(s):

H. Samy Alim is Associate Professor of Education and (by courtesy) Anthropology and Linguistics at Stanford University, where he directs the Center for Race, Ethnicity, and Language (CREAL) and the Institute for Diversity in the Arts (IDA). Some of his most recent books include You Know My Steez, Roc the Mic Right, Talkin Black Talk, and Global Linguistic Flows. He has also written for various media outlets, including The New York Times, Al-Ahram Weekly (Cairo), and The Philadelphia New Observer, among others.

Geneva Smitherman is University Distinguished Professor Emerita of English, Co-Founder and Core Faculty, African American and African Studies, and Core Faculty, African Studies Center, at Michigan State University. She is a pioneering scholar-activist in the struggle for language rights and for Black Studies. Her list of books includes Talkin and Testifyin, Discourse and Discrimination, Black Talk, Talkin That Talk, Language Diversity in the Classroom, and Word from the Mother.


Jumat, 22 Juni 2012

Senin, 23 Januari 2012

Left of Black S2:E16 | ‘Blackness’, Professional Sports and the #Occupy the Academy Movement




Left of Black S2:E16
‘Blackness’, Professional Sports and the #Occupy the Academy Movement

w/ Bomani Jones, Professor David J. Leonard and Professor James Braxton Peterson
January 23, 2012

Host and Duke UniversityProfessor Mark Anthony Neal is joined via Skype© by David J. Leonard and in-studio by Bomani Jones.  Leonard is an associate professor in the Department of Critical Culture, Gender, and Race Studies at Washington State University at Pullman and the author of the forthcoming After Artest, Race and the Assault on Blackness (SUNY Press).  Jones is a journalist, sports commentator, former host of The Morning Jones and a well-known contributor to ESPN’s Around the Horn and Jim Rome is Burning.  The trio discuss responses and effects of the recent 2011 NBA lockout and how it relates to race.  Leonard and Jones highlight how branding defines basketball’s popularity and the irreplaceable value of the sport’s greatest athletes.  Lastly, the conversation touches on the comparison between how fans value the NFL differently than the NBA.

Later, Neal is joined via Skype© by James Braxton Peterson, director of Africana Studies and associate professor of English at Lehigh University.  A frequent contributor to MSNBC, Peterson addresses the impact of scholars who reach well beyond the Academy.  Neal and Peterson also discuss the scholarly impact of the  #Occupy Movement as expressed in Peterson’s recent HuffPost Black Voices article, “#Occupy the Academy.”  
 
***

Left of Black is a weekly Webcast hosted by Mark Anthony Neal and produced in collaboration with the John Hope Franklin Center at Duke University.

***

Episodes of Left of Blackare also available for download @ iTunes U

Minggu, 22 Januari 2012

‘Blackness’, Professional Sports and the #Occupy the Academy Movement on the January 23rd ‘Left of Black’





























‘Blackness’, Professional Sports and the #Occupy the Academy Movement on the January 23rd ‘Left of Black’



Host and Duke University Professor Mark Anthony Neal is joined via Skype© by David J. Leonard and in-studio by Bomani Jones.  Leonard is an associate professor in the Department of Critical Culture, Gender, and Race Studies at Washington State University at Pullman and the author of the forthcoming After Artest, Race and the Assault on Blackness (SUNY Press).  Jones is a journalist, sports commentator, former host of The Morning Jones and a well-known contributor to ESPN’s Around the Horn and Jim Rome is Burning.  The trio discuss responses and effects of the recent 2011 NBA lockout and how it relates to race.  Leonard and Jones highlight how branding defines basketball’s popularity and the irreplaceable value of the sport’s greatest athletes.  Lastly, the conversation touches on the comparison between how fans value the NFL differently than the NBA.



Later, Neal is joined via Skype© by James Braxton Peterson, director of Africana Studies and associate professor of English at Lehigh University.  A frequent contributor to MSNBC, Peterson addresses the impact of scholars who reach well beyond the Academy.  Neal and Peterson also discuss the scholarly impact of the  #Occupy Movement as expressed in Peterson’s recent HuffPost Black Voices article, “#Occupy the Academy.” 



***



Left of Black airs at 1:30 p.m. (EST) on Mondays on the Ustream channel: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/left-of-black. Viewers are invited to participate in a Twitter conversation with Neal and featured guests while the show airs using hash tags #LeftofBlack or #dukelive. 



Left of Blackis recorded and produced at the John Hope Franklin Center of International and Interdisciplinary Studies at Duke University.



***



Follow Left of Black on Twitter: @LeftofBlack

Follow Mark Anthony Neal on Twitter: @NewBlackMan

Follow David J. Leonard on Twitter: @Dr_DJL

Follow Bomani Jones on Twitter: @Bomani_Jones

Follow James Braxton Peterson on Twitter: @DrJamesPeterson



###

Rabu, 04 Januari 2012

Occupy the Academy (#OTA)


Occupy the Academy (#OTA)
by James Braxton Peterson | HuffPost BlackVoices

"Writers write; teachers teach; activists act . . . Good scholars do all of the above"

Universities have had a tough year in terms of public relations. Over the course of 2011 there were multiple full-blown scandals. The Penn State and Syracuse University-coach-as-pedophile/predator scandals rocked the media sphere. The 'exceptional brutality' pepper-sprayed at UC Davis students shocked any of us who were previously unaware of just how brutal unchecked police forces can be. One of the most storied Historically Black Universities, Florida A&M University, with the premier HBCU marching band, is in danger of losing its accreditation as a result of an alleged hazing-related death. In early April, Yale University students filed a formal Title IX complaint against the university for its failure to address the kind of systemic misogyny that is all too common on college campuses and more often than not, too readily ignored. Throw in "a study released by the Pew Research Center," that suggests that 57 percent of college customers -- um, I mean students -- do not feel that they are getting their money's worth and I think most University PR officers will concede that 2011 has been a collective disaster for the University brand -- broadly conceived.


These are just a handful of the most publicly covered University issues. And they cannot be cast as mere PR disasters; each of the aforementioned cases represents deep-rooted challenges that the University (or more to my point -- the Academy) must address on multiple fronts immediately. Pedophilia, rape, violence, and misogyny are terrorizing our 'society'. When any or all of these crimes against humanity become manifest in the Academy -- scholars of the academic disciplines (especially in the humanities) must assume the charge of addressing pedophilia, rape, violence, and misogyny directly and diligently. Otherwise the Academy is a bastion of artifice, fear, and contradiction. Aren't we supposed to be preparing young folk to be sensible (and sensitive) citizens? Maybe we are, but the results are confusing. Consider the riots at PSU in the immediate aftermath of the firing of Head Coach Joe Paterno; or the courage under fire exhibited by those students pepper-sprayed at UC Davis; or the mentality of the band members who allegedly beat their colleague to death; or the frat boys at Yale who circulated a "pre-season scouting report" on first-year women students; or the Yale undergrads who filed the Title IX complaint. 

And then there's the Occupy movement. In late December 2011, Stanford University professor, H. Samy Alim posed an ill question -- "What if We Occupied Language?" Alim accomplishes some swift academic and political work in the piece. But the centerpiece resides in the shifting meaning of the word, "occupy," itself: "[i]t's no longer primarily about force of military power; instead it signifies standing up to injustice, inequality and abuse of power. It's no longer about simply occupying a space; it's about transforming that space." For me, this is the kind of work that the Academy, (that academics), must do -- not instead of, but in addition to the traditional activist work that must be done. We have to Occupy the Academy -- transform the ivory tower from its traditional gothic structure -- featuring racism, sexism, classism, and ism-ism -- into a more malleable structure, where ideas can live and breath. The Academy must be a place where respect for peace, equality and humanity is an absolute given. #Occupy the Academy. 

I admit that neither Alim's essay or the Occupy movement itself is the sole impetus for the #OTA movement. And for those who will ask about #OTA's direction and directives; what is #OTA's purpose; how does it work; who are its leaders; what are #OTA's list of demands -- I can only say to you that this movement has been in the making for some time now. This year's disastrous news narratives point to some of the ways in which the civic principles of the Academy have been taken for granted or worse, obscured in the tyranny of tradition. As we have become more aware of gender, rape and violence in society and in the Academy, the challenge is for academics to use the tools at our disposal to join the battle, to make the world safer for children, for women; to make this country fair for undocumented workers, for disenfranchised voters, and so on and so on. 

In the last several years a handful of organic scholars have decided to come back to school for graduate degrees in the Humanities. Rosa Clemente, Joan Morgan, and Scott Poulson-Bryant are at UMASS, NYU, and Harvard respectively. Each of them enjoyed full-blown careers as a political leader, a journalist, and a novelist (respectively) and each of them are currently working on Ph.D.'s in the humanities. Byron Hurt, Stephanie Renee, (and too many others to name here) are likewise, established (Hurt is an award winning documentary filmmaker, Renee is media mogul/poet) and currently considering their own forays into the Academy for graduate degrees in the Humanities (no pressure, folks). Belinda Peterson - yes I am name checking my wife - is a registered nurse and she is also currently working on her Ph.D. in English (Lehigh). For me, this group of non-traditional graduate students, represent what's best to come for the Academy and they are the inspiration for the movement to Occupy the Academy. 

That is not at all to say that the Academy doesn't already have its share of progressive, communally focused folk, or its own share of activists. Jared Ball (U of M) and Salamishah Tillet (UPENN) come immediately to mind. But in order to transform the academic space we will need more soldiers for social justice. In an academy populated by folk of the ilk mentioned above disasters like those mentioned earlier will be less likely to happen. Moreover, as we Occupy the Academy, we will establish a more robust sustained effort to challenge misogyny, gender inequality, rape, and violence, social ills that plague us in and outside of the ivory tower. 

#OTA

***

James Braxton Peterson is Director of Africana Studies and Associate Professor of English at Lehigh University  and the author of the forthcoming Major Figures: Critical Essays on Hip Hop Music(Mississippi University Press). Follow him at @DrJamesPeterson.

Rabu, 21 Desember 2011

What If We Occupied Language?

Dread Scott and Kyle Goen





























What If We Occupied Language?
by H. Samy Alim | New York Times | The Stone

When I flew out from the San Francisco airport last October, we crossed above the ports that Occupy Oakland helped shut down, and arrived in Germany to be met by traffic caused by Occupy Berlin protestors. But the movement has not only transformed public space, it has transformed the public discourse as well.

Occupy.

It is now nearly impossible to hear the word and not think of the Occupy movement.

Even as distinguished an expert as the lexicographer and columnist Ben Zimmer admitted as much this week: “occupy, ” he said, is the odds-on favorite to be chosen as the American Dialect Society’s Word of the Year.

It has already succeeded in shifting the terms of the debate, taking phrases like “debt-ceiling” and “budget crisis” out of the limelight and putting terms like “inequality” and “greed” squarely in the center. This discursive shift has made it more difficult for Washington to obscure the spurious reasons for the financial meltdown and the unequal outcomes it has exposed and further produced.

To most, the irony of a progressive social movement using the term “occupy” to reshape how Americans think about issues of democracy and equality has been clear. After all, it is generally nations, armies and police who occupy, usually by force. And in this, the United States has been a leader. The American government is just now after nine years ending its overt occupation of Iraq, is still entrenched in Afghanistan and is maintaining troops on the ground in dozens of countries worldwide. All this is not to obscure the fact that the United States as we know it came into being by way of an occupation —  a gradual and devastatingly violent one that all but extinguished entire Native American populations across thousands of miles of land

Yet in a very short time, this movement has dramatically changed how we think about occupation. In early September, “occupy” signaled on-going military incursions. Now it signifies progressive political protest. It’s no longer primarily about force of military power; instead it signifies standing up to injustice, inequality and abuse of power. It’s no longer about simply occupying a space; it’s about transforming that space.


In this sense, Occupy Wall Street has occupied language, has made “occupy” its own. And, importantly, people from diverse ethnicities, cultures and languages have participated in this linguistic occupation — it is distinct from the history of forcible occupation in that it is built to accommodate all, not just the most powerful or violent.

As Geoff Nunberg, the long-time chair of the usage panel for American Heritage Dictionary, and others have explained, the earliest usage of occupy in English that was linked to protest can be traced to English media descriptions of Italian demonstrations in the 1920s, in which workers “occupied” factories until their demands were met. This is a far cry from some of its earlier meanings. In fact, The Oxford English Dictionary tells us that “occupy” once meant “to have sexual intercourse with.” One could imagine what a phrase like “Occupy Wall Street” might have meant back then.

In October, Zimmer, who is also the chair of the American Dialect Society’s New Word Committee, noted on NPR’s “On the Media” that the meaning of occupy has changed  dramatically since its arrival into the English language in the 14th century. “It’s almost always been used as a transitive verb,” Zimmer said. “That’s a verb that takes an object, so you occupy a place or a space. But then it became used as a rallying cry, without an object, just to mean to take part in what are now called the Occupy protests. It’s being used as a modifier — Occupy protest, Occupy movement. So it’s this very flexible word now that’s filling many grammatical slots in the language.”

What if we transformed the meaning of occupy yet again? Specifically, what if we thought of Occupy Language as more than the language of the Occupy movement, and began to think about it as a movement in and of itself? What kinds of issues would Occupy Language address? What would taking language back from its self-appointed “masters” look like?  We might start by looking at these questions from the perspective of race and discrimination, and answer with how to foster fairness and equality in that realm.

Occupy Language might draw inspiration from both the way that the Occupy movement has reshaped definitions of “occupy,” which teaches us that we give words meaning and that discourses are not immutable, and from the way indigenous movements have contested its use, which teaches us to be ever-mindful about how language both empowers and oppresses, unifies and isolates.

For starters, Occupy Language might first look inward. In a recent interview, Julian Padilla of the People of Color Working Group pushed the Occupy movement to examine its linguistic choices:
To occupy means to hold space, and I think a group of anti-capitalists holding space on Wall Street is powerful, but I do wish the NYC movement would change its name to “‘decolonise Wall Street”’ to take into account history, indigenous critiques, people of colour and imperialism… Occupying space is not inherently bad, it’s all about who and how and why. When  white colonizers occupy land, they don’t just sleep there over night, they steal and destroy. When indigenous people occupied Alcatraz Island it was (an act of) protest.
This linguistic change can remind Americans that a majority of the 99 percent has benefited from the occupation of native territories.

Occupy Language might also support the campaign to stop the media from using the word “illegal” to refer to “undocumented” immigrants. From the campaign’s perspective, only inanimate objects and actions are labeled illegal in English; therefore the use of “illegals” to refer to human beings is dehumanizing. The New York Times style book currently asks writers to avoid terms like “illegal alien” and “undocumented,” but says nothing about “illegals.” Yet The Times’ standards editor, Philip B. Corbett, did recently weigh in on this, saying that the term “illegals” has an “unnecessarily pejorative tone” and that “it’s wise to steer clear.”

Pejorative, discriminatory language can have real life consequences. In this case, activists worry about the coincidence of the rise in the use of the term “illegals” and the spike in hate crimes against all Latinos. As difficult as it might be to prove causation here, the National Institute for Latino Policy reports that the F.B.I.’s annual Hate Crime Statistics show that Latinos comprised two thirds of the victims of ethnically motivated hate crimes in 2010. When someone is repeatedly described as something, language has quietly paved the way for violent action.

But Occupy Language should concern itself with more than just the words we use; it should also work towards eliminating language-based racism and discrimination. In the legal system, CNN recently reported that the U.S. Justice Department alleges that Arizona’s infamous Sheriff Joe Arpaio, among other offenses, has discriminated against “Latino inmates with limited English by punishing them and denying critical services.” In education, as linguistic anthropologist Ana Celia Zentella notes, hostility towards those who speak “English with an accent” (Asians, Latinos, and African Americans) continues to be a problem. In housing, The National Fair Housing Alliance has long recognized “accents” as playing a significant role in housing discrimination. On the job market, language-based discrimination intersects with issues of race, ethnicity, class and national origin to make it more difficult for well-qualified applicants with an “accent” to receive equal opportunities.

In the face of such widespread language-based discrimination, Occupy Language can be a critical, progressive linguistic movement that exposes how language is used as a means of social, political and economic control. By occupying language, we can expose how educational, political, and social institutions use language to further marginalize oppressed groups; resist colonizing language practices that elevate certain languages over others; resist attempts to define people with terms rooted in negative stereotypes; and begin to reshape the public discourse about our communities, and about the central role of language in racism and discrimination.

As the global Occupy movement has shown, words can move entire nations of people — even the world — to action. Occupy Language, as a movement, should speak to the power of language to transform how we think about the past, how we act in the present, and how we envision the future.

The illustrations for this post are part of a collection of Occupy movement posters at the site Occuprint
.

***

H. Samy Alim directs the Center for Race, Ethnicity, and Language (CREAL) at Stanford University. His forthcoming book, Articulate While Black: Barack Obama, Language, and Race in the U.S., written with Geneva Smitherman, examines the racial politics of the Obama presidency through a linguistic lens.