Tampilkan postingan dengan label tween. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label tween. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 03 November 2011

Is the Tween World Ready for the Subaltern? A.N.T. Farm and the Politics of Blackness



















Is the Tween World Ready for the Subaltern? 
A.N.T. Farm and the Politics of Blackness
by David J. Leonard | NewBlackMan

Having already graduated Miley Cyrus, Selena Gomez, and Demi Lovato to various forms of stardom, it should be of little surprise that Disney has sought to infuse younger talent as a way to maintain its stranglehold on tween audiences.  In recent years this has increasingly proven difficult given the success of Nickelodeon with the emergence of Miranda Cosgrove and Victoria Justice. 

Realizing the increasingly fickle marketplace, Disney has sought to change-up the formula in some regards in building a show around a young African-American girl, Chyna.  A.N.T Farm chronicles the story of three genius middle-schoolers who because of their talents and skills attend high school as part of its advanced program.  While participating in the Advanced Natural Talent Program (A.N.T), they face numerous dilemmas resulting from their special gifts, tensions with their older schoolmates, and simply because they are kids growing up in a complex world. 

Although A.N.T. Farm explores this issues amongst the three main characters, Chyna (the musical prodigy), Olive (the girl with a photographic memory), and Fletcher (the artist), the show is truly a show about Chyna.   From the inclusion of her family to the endless opportunities for her to showcase her musical talents, whether it be playing the violin, jamming on the guitar, or singing a familiar pop song, the show is really one that is selling China Anne McClain (Tyler Perry’s House of Payne), who stars as Chyna.

According to one review of the show, A.N.T. Farm represents a continuation, albeit modified, of the proven formula of Disney’s grooming stars of significant marketing potential: “Disney has turned the concept into its latest situation comedy—and a star-grooming vehicle for the very talented China Anne McClain. China, who plays Chyna, is one of the Mouse House's latest singing, dancing mini-Mileys, sure to soon grace lunchboxes and toothbrushes everywhere.”  While certainly true, with a CD and the back-to-school Chyna accessory package just around the corner, the significance of this A.N.T. Farm transcends the commercial practices of Disney.

The introduction of an African American potential superstar in the tween marketplace, one that requires star power and crossover appeal, is important. Brooks Barnes, in The New York Times, describes the qualities required of a tween superstar as follows:

Creating a breakout tween superstar takes years of careful grooming that hark back to Hollywood’s studio system days. Disney, scouring audition tapes and the Web, looks for various elements: presence, a genuine interest in show business and raw talent in acting, singing or dancing. Good looks are a must, but so is a certain blandness. Tween viewers gravitate toward actresses who they think have best-friend potential; the slightest mean-girl whiff can prevent a star-in-the-making from reaching the stratosphere.   

Given the history of race and racism, the persistent demonization of African American women as loud, mean, and aggressive, and given the systematic erasure of young black girls from television culture, it is easy to see the ways in which the arrival of A.N.T. Farm can be seen as transformative and ground-breaking. 

Evidence by blog commentaries, the prospect of a Disney show starring a young African American girl led to praise and celebration.  For example, Kimberly Seals Allers laments the lack of diversity available for youth of color, praising Disney for the creation of A.N.T Farm because of its potential positive impact on African American girls:  “As a mother, trying to raise a young black girl with positive self-esteem and self-love for her hair, her body and her mind, it’s frustrating that my daughter doesn’t see many images of herself on her own favorite channel. I knew things were bad when she begged me to buy her a Hannah wig (it wasn’t Halloween) and complained a lot about her own thick hair,” writes Allers on a parenting blog. “So I was really happy to see the new Disney show starring the very sweet and lovely, China Anne McClain.... And the character has a two-parent home! Whoo hoo! When she says she wants her hair to be straighter and longer and her skin lighter, it breaks my heart.  I’m working super hard to do my part to counteract that. But I’m hoping a vivacious, and talented young brown girl on the TV screen every week will help a little too.”   

Searles reiterated this same theme on her own blog, Mocha Manuel, focusing on the show’s potential message to young African American girls: “Anyway, I know it's up to us parents to instill in our little brown girls the self-love that the media could never do and to fill the hole of positive images with our own research and resourcefulness, but I'm hoping an A.N.T. Farm and this talented, beautiful, young black girl can help a little too. Are you hoping the same? Why are we still struggling to see positive young black girls on kids TV?”   Similarly, Meghan Harvey, who praised the show for a variety of girls, seemed to highlight the shows efforts to challenge stereotypes, especially as it relates to girls and African Americans

Smart is Cool – The girls on these shows are all smart girls who make good grades and school a priority, yet they are all cool. In fact the show Ant Farm, centers on the “ANT” program for gifted youngsters who have skipped a few grades including our lead character. And with A.N.T. Farm it’s also great to see a super smart African American girl back on the Disney channel! It’s about time.

The concerns and hopes here are obviously real, reflecting on the damaging impact of popular culture and society at large on African American identity (See Kari Davis).  It does represent an important intervention in a cultural world that normalizes whiteness as the standard of measurement all while demeaning and devaluing those who come to embody the OTHER within the dominant white imagination.  According to Anne Ducille, in writing about her experiences with toys and dolls, children’s culture is one of hegemonic whiteness:

Whitewashed by the images with which I was daily bombarded, for most of my childhood I little noticed that the dolls I played with, the heroes I worshipped, and the alter egos I invented did not look like me. The make-believe world to which I surrendered my disbelief was profoundly white. That is to say, the “me” I invented, the self I day-dreamed in technicolor fantasies, was no more black like me than the dolls I played with” (duCille, 1996, pp. 11-12, in Guerrero p. 187)

As such, the introduction of a show centering around a young-African American girl represents a counter narrative to the cultural jamming of whiteness, albeit limited because of broader racial realities and its emphasis on a middle-class sensibility, its elevation of a politics of respectability, and of course the difficult path of countering hegemonic stereotypes.  Celebrations, notwithstanding, the show replicates what S. Craig Watkins describes as a commitment “to the notion of promoting respectable – or in other words, bourgeois – images of blackness.”

The creation of A.N.T Farm, however, should not simply be thought of in terms of Disney’s efforts to challenge persistent racist images within American culture or even its efforts to provide black youth with “role models” and “positive representations.”  It is clearly a marketing strategy that seeks to capitalize on a market share that has ostensibly been ignored by television networks: African American families.  Describing it as “shrewd marketing” “at a time when children’s channels are working harder to find minority stars.” Brooks Barnes highlights the economic calculations here. It is

Signaling to parents that diversity is a priority. But Nickelodeon and Disney also want to hold a mirror to a diversifying viewer base. “We have taught children to look for themselves,” Mr. Marsh said.

Other actresses vying for tween superstardom are Zendaya, a biracial 14-year-old who co-stars in Disney Channel’s budding dance hit, “Shake It Up.” Coco Jones, 12, is an African-American singer. (Combine Jennifer Hudson with Rihanna and give the results a middle school gloss.) Ms. Jones has become a darling of Radio Disney. Nickelodeon is developing a series around Cymphonique Miller, a 14-year-old African-American singer and actress, called “How to Rock Braces and Glasses.”

While writing about Nickelodeon in her fantastic book Kid’s Rule: Nickelodeon and Consumer Citizenship, Sarah Banet-Weiser’s observations are applicable to Disney and in this case A.N.T Farm, a show that imagines a world where “race is simply something that ‘happens’ in a kid’s world” (p. 170).  Thus far, it has gone to great lengths to avoid racial conflict and tension, all while imagining blackness and whiteness as insignificant in the daily lives of American kids.  In this regard, it operates through the commodification of blackness that ultimately reifies the hegemonic practice of reducing race to little more than a cultural or aesthetic marker.  

Embodying Anne DuCille’s idea of “mass produced difference” A.N.T Farm, highlights the broader approach to race within children’s television culture (and popular culture as a whole). “Any time representation of race is produced it reflects a stereotype or a narrativizing of a cultural myth about race – even if ostensibly ‘positive,’” writes Banet-Weiser.   Or as Lisa Guerrero notes,  “race merely serves as another kind of ‘accessory’ that signifies ‘hipness,’ without incurring the actual costs and consequences of real world racial signification.”  As such, Disney “employs several different strategies of representing race: race either is represented as hip or cool, as a kind of aesthetic style or it is represented through the lens of authenticity, with ‘real’ tropes structure the narrative of the program.  The inclusion of explicitly racial images . . . coincides with the exclusion of a specifically racial agenda, so that inclusion functions as a kind of exclusion” (Banet-Weiser, p. 171). 

A.N.T Farm bridges these two themes together, using race as an unspoken backdrop for viewing Chyna all while constructing her as a “real” breath of fresh air that challenges the less desirable and less positive (yet no less supposedly real) representations of blackness within popular culture.  Most importantly, it follows suit with other programs through its erasure of an explicit “racial agenda.”  It lacks even the mere hint of the ways in which the race, class, sexuality, and gender are lived by American teenagers.

In her essay about race, gender, and the Bratz dolls, Lisa Guerrero highlights the complex relationship between children (particularly children of color) and dolls/toys/popular culture.  She notes that, at one level, visibility, inclusion, and the ability to see oneself within spaces of play and consumption are important.  At another level, given commercial demands and the practice of denying and erasing the real-life realities of race, gender, and class, these representations can be at best limiting, and at worst problematic, all while normalizing whiteness. Guerrero notes in “Can the Subaltern Shop: The Commodification of Difference in the Bratz Dolls:”

As much as the dolls rely on images of difference, that difference relies on naturalized notions of whiteness. The dolls may be succeeding in presenting a new, and much needed idea of difference as beautiful and coveted, but that idea still exists in opposition to the “normal,” White beauty that Barbie, and the ideals reflected in her and her world, present. Ultimately, though, it is a start.

However small the impact of a doll may seem, and despite some of the paradoxes of the Bratz’s representation of difference, there remains an important oppositional potential about the collection. They have presented a challenge to the Anglocentric version of womanhood found in the arena of toys that has been dominant since the 1959 introduction of Barbie. They have given face to difference and provided images through which young girls of color might find themselves reflected. And they have begun the work toward opening up a space in the popular imaginary for the normalization of multiracial identities. 

A.N.T. Farm, despite its shortcomings, much of which reflects the broader cultural/political landscape and the dubious motives and marketing plans of Disney, illustrate this same important instance of change.  The tween world is embodies the hyper emphasis on materialism and consumption, yet given the hegemony of whiteness the entry of China Anne McClain it is hard not to think about this change as transformative a frustrating intervention at that. 

***

David J. Leonard is Associate Professor in the Department of Critical Culture, Gender and Race Studies at Washington State University, Pullman. He is the author of Screens Fade to Black: Contemporary African American Cinema and the forthcoming After Artest: Race and the War on Hoop(SUNY Press). Leonard is a regular contributor to NewBlackMan and blogs @ No Tsuris.



Rabu, 17 Agustus 2011

The Tweening of America: The Disappearance of Age-Appropriate Television



The Tweening of America: The Disappearance of Age-Appropriate Television
by David J. Leonard | NewBlackMan

What started as an ordinary conversation about marriage between my partner and our 7 ½ year old daughter (Rea) concretized our ongoing frustrations and precarious relationship with popular culture.  Following a role-playing game that ended in a pretend marriage between Rea and Sam (our son, who will be four next month), my partner asked Sam if he knew what marriage meant.  Unsure, Rea intervened with a very elaborate description that went something like this: it is when two people meet and then start to date.  If they like each other, they continue to date for a while until they are ready to get married.  At the wedding, the promise to follow the rules for married people.  While her description actually encompassed a few more details, it was clear that she not only understands dating, relationships, and courting rituals, but the institution of marriage and the associated vows.  At the age of 7 ½ , she is well versed in both the fairy-tale and happily-ever-after narratives of marriage.

Over the last year, my partner and I have struggled to help Rea find age-appropriate, and most importantly, empowering television shows.  In her mind, she is too mature and grown-up for those preschool/kindergarten shows.  You know that ones that emphasize language skills, inter-personal skill development, symbolic reason, and cultural literacy: Sesame Street, Arthur, Sid the Science Kid, Word Girl, and Martha Speaks.  In her estimation, these shows are neither cool nor sophisticated enough for her; her brother yes, but definitely not for a 2nd grader.  Simply put, those shows are boring and, worse, beneath her.  Instead, she would much rather watch shows like ICarly, Victorious, Hannah Montana, Wizards of Waverly Place, Good Luck Charlie, or countless other tween shows. 

According to Gary Marsh, a top executive at Disney Channels Worldwide: “It's always been presumed that animation is the gravy train. Nobody quite understood you could create lifestyle franchises out of live-action tween shows." Similarly, Peter Larsen, in “TV’s Tween Scene,” describes this cultural shift as not only economically significant but culturally important as well: “What they discovered was that kids in that age range didn't want to watch shows for little kids, and didn't want to watch their parents' shows. Instead, they wanted to see themselves and their stories on TV.”

While trying to attract the 9-14 age consumers (25 million in the United States, representing a 50 billion dollar industry), tween shows universally tell stories of TEENAGERS.  ICarly chronicles the trials and tribulations of Carly Shay and friends, now in high school, who have their own webcast.  One Nickelodeon executive identified the show as one about “relationships and humor” a fact that illustrated by a list of Carly’s “boyfriends, dates and crushes” on one website.  Victorious similarly follows high school kids at a performing art school in Hollywood, CA.  It, like just about every other show, explores the issues of relationships, getting-in-trouble, boyfriends and girlfriends.   While focusing on the experiences and stories of 13-16 year olds, the dearth of shows dealing with the experiences of 6-10 year old kids, along with marketing efforts directed at these younger consumers, results in gravitation to shows that are more teen than tween. 


Our discomfort with her watching shows that focus on dating, boys and materialism, looking beautiful and being cool isn’t simply about age appropriateness and our desire for her to define her identity and otherwise imagine her own childhood outside of teenager themes and issues.  The focus on dating sends a message that coolness and acceptance comes for girls who have a boyfriend, who guys think are attractive, and who has been kissed.   Likewise, too much of these shows chronicle the struggles of girls to be accepted, to feel good about themselves, and part of this comes from the struggles to get a boyfriend. 

According to a 2009 study from True Child, school-age television shows lag significantly behind preschool shows in terms of offering representation of confident and self-aware girls.  Compared to 94% of preschool shows, only 42% of shows geared toward school-age kids like my daughter exhibit characteristics like confidence, assertiveness, and high-self esteem.  Similarly, the report found that “49% of shows feature at “82% of shows feature girls primarily with long hair”; “60% of the shows feature girls who are underweight with skinner than average waists.”

The questionable messages about consumerism, gendered-identity, and appearance-determined coolness run against the presented image of the Disney and Nickelodeon shows about girl power.  As example, True Child celebrated several tween girl shows for “breaking through gender stereotypes.”  Similarly, David Bushman argues the importance these shows in giving girls something to watch that indeed is about confident girls:

I think Nickelodeon has empowered kids in a lot of ways … but I think they’ve specifically empowered young girls, and that’s a really important thing that Nickelodeon deserves a lot of credit for. This whole idea that you could not make girl-centric shows because boys wouldn’t watch them, they disproved that theory (in Banet-Weiser).

Yet, visibility and even challenging stereotypes isn’t the only issue to consider when examining these shows. Visibility doesn’t generate empowerment; visibility isn’t by definition empowering. 

“Third Wave feminism (or sometimes “Girlie feminism”) embraces commercial media visibility and enthusiastically celebrates the power that comes with it,” writes Sarah Banet-Weiser.  “In this way, Third Wave feminism situates issues of gender within commercial and popular culture, and insistently positions Third Wave feminist politics as not only fundamentally different from Second Wave feminist politics, but because of the embrace of media visibility and the commercial world, as also more representative for a new generation of women.”   The celebration of these shows, against a backdrop of hyper consumerism, hyper materialism, and an over-emphasis on an appearance, relationships, and coolness, illustrates the problematic nature of “girlie feminism” in the context of popular commodity culture.
 
The source of empowerment and collective identity that results from these shows isn’t driven from political, cultural or social power, but the power of visibility and the market.  This doesn’t result in individual or collective power.   Susan Douglas, in Where the Girls Are: Growing Up Female with the Mass Media notes, “Once this sense of generational collectivity as a market evaporates, so does the sense of political collectivity.”  In generating individual identities tied to consumerism, material consumption, personal choice, and being attached, these shows are promoting a different sort of power for future generations. 

To be clear, our struggles with tween shows isn’t just about whether or not a 7 ½-year should watch shows that often deal with dating, relationships, and other high-school themes.  Her expertise in dating and marriage illustrates the power in these shows, and the messages she is receiving, all of which is leading her to think more and more about relationships and the importance of her appearance.  For appearance and having a boyfriend are constructed as the core elements of cool within these shows.

While that is certainly an issue at the moment, hoping that she will see her identity outside of being attached and having the right clothes, these concerns and criticism about the consumer message transcend the moment.  When she is 10, 12, 14, and so on, we will remain vigilant in challenging these messages and pushing her to think critically about the media world she lives within.

On a regular basis, I ask my daughter questions, challenging her to think about the pedagogical messages transmitted on television and in the broader popular culture.  I ask her why so many female characters, otherwise talented as students, artists, and athletes, spend so much time within these show trying to attract the attention of boys.  I ask her why these “free-spirited” individuals seem so focused on fitting, on being cool, and otherwise acting like everyone else.  I ask her why she thinks these shows go to great lengths to encourage her to want things either because of the products they have or because of the endless show-related stuff for sale.  Just this week, in regards to this article, we were talking about the lessons learned from these shows.  In response to my comments about consumerism, she offered the following: “But I like to shop. I like to look at things.”

Me: You don’t like to shop, you like to buy

Rea: Yes, I like to buy

Me: Why?

Rea: Because I like to get things

Me: Why?

Rea: because I like to have things?

Me: Why?

Rea: How many whys are you going to ask me?

Pushing her to think about learned consumerism, and how popular culture defines her primary role as a citizen to be both a consumer and a girlfriend/wife is difficult given the ways in which tween shows link both to acceptability and coolness.  Challenging her to think about why being attractive, having to have a boyfriend, the right clothes/shoes/ jewelry is so often tied to her identity as girl is not easy. 

Yet, the importance of pushing back, challenging the heteronormative patriarchy lessons emanating from these shows, all while questioning the idea that power comes from visibility, is clear. “Young girls – our daughters, our nieces, our friends kids – need to learn how to talk back to the media at ever younger ages,” writes Susan Douglas in The Rise of Enlightened Sexism: How Pop Culture took us from Girl Power to Girls Gone Wild. “Talking back to the media may seem inconsequential or fruitless – and indeed, it only has a limited effect in bringing about change – but look at some of the great stuff we get to see now that we never saw in, say, 1985.  But that’s not the points – it’s not necessarily about them, it’s about us, and changing what we can imagine.”  We are working hard so that Rea is able to imagine a world beyond the tween world commonplace on television.  We are working hard to help her see herself beyond the constructed reality of America’s tween television fantasies.   

***

David J. Leonard is Associate Professor in the Department of Critical Culture, Gender and Race Studies at Washington State University, Pullman. He has written on sport, video games, film, and social movements, appearing in both popular and academic mediums. His work explores the political economy of popular culture, examining the interplay between racism, state violence, and popular representations through contextual, textual, and subtextual analysis. He is the author of Screens Fade to Black: Contemporary African American Cinema and the forthcoming After Artest: Race and the War on Hoop (SUNY Press). Leonard is a regular contributor to NewBlackMan and blogs @ No Tsuris.